 |
Pleural Plaques Update |
|
Overview |
 |
|
It is not currently possible to claim for pleural plaques if exposure to asbestos occurred in England or Wales.
However, it may be possible to claim in the near future. |
|
If exposure to asbestos occurred in Scotland you may now claim compensation for Pleural Plaques (see below).
For the rest of the UK, you can claim compensation for pleural thickening and other asbestos related diseases. If you have been recently diagnosed with pleural plaques,
you can still call us for advice on the options available - you may be entitled to compensation from the government under the
under the Pneumoconiosis Act of 1979. |
|
| The following is a brief summary of the ongoing pleural plaques debate from the
House of Commons, House of Lords and Scottish Parliament . . .
|
|
|
|
Scotish Parliament pass Pleural Plaques legislation - March 2009 |
|
A House of Lords ruling which stated compensation could not be claimed for pleural plaques
has been overturned by a new law passed recently by the Scotish Parliament.
Hundreds of Scots (many of them Clydeside shipyard workers) have been diagnosed with more
serious asbestos diseases such as lung cancer and mesothelioma.
The Damages Bill (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) was recently passed by 98 votes to 16. |
|
|
The bill only applies where exposure to asbestos happened in Scotland, the Lords judgement will still
apply in England and Wales. The Law Lords had ruled that pleural plaques - a benign scarring of the
lungs - are only an indication that there has been exposure to asbestos and should not be open to
claims for compensation as it had no symptoms and was not a disease. |
|
Pleural plaques do not develop into or cause more serious asbestos-related conditions,
however, due to the exposure to asbestos, they do indicate an increased risk of developing mesothelioma.
At Holyrood, there was cross-party support for the bill inspite of an earlier warning from the
parliament's justice committee that the Government in Scotland may have to pay out millions in
compensation to former naval shipyards employees who had been exposed to asbestos. |
|
|
It was claimed by The Association of British Insurers that passing the pleural plaques bill
would send out the wrong message about the seriousness of the condition. Professor Anthony Seaton,
who treats patients with asbestos related diseases, claimed that people diagnosed with pleural plaques
could be confused by their doctors who failed to clarify the benign nature of their condition.
|
|
|
|
Prime Ministers Questions - Wednesday 12th March 2008 |
|
Mr. Stephen Hepburn (Jarrow) (Lab):
 |
|
The Prime Minister:
 |
|
|
|
HOUSE OF LORDS - WEDNESDAY 17th OCTOBER 2007 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Court of Appeal Decision Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co Ltd - 06 January 2006 |
|
| Overview |
|
Pleural plaques are scarrings on the lungs caused by asbestos exposure.
It is accepted as an asymptomatic condition which is a clear indication of significant
asbestos exposure. Pleual plaque victims have an increased risk of developing more serious asbestos
diseases such as pleural thickening, asbestosis, asbestos related lung cancer or mesothelioma.
|
|
|
The risk of developing a more serious asbestos conditions in the future may cause pleural plaque
victims to develop psychological symptoms.
|
|
| Damages |
Before to the Appeal the pleural plaque victim had 2 choices:
He could accept provisional damages for pleural plaques of around £4,000, with the option of returning to court
if more serious asbestos related conditions developed at a later date.
Or if he wanted to settle on a full and final and full basis he could accept between £7,000 and £10,000. |
|
| Court of Appeal Decision |
There was a 2:1 majority verdict from Court of Appeal that pleural plaques did not give rise to any
physical symptoms and did not amount to anything more than minimal damage so victims of pleural plaques
were unable to establish a cause of action.
If there was a diagnosis of pleural thickening, the Court also ruled that if the condition was
asymptomatic damages could not be sought. |
|
| Psychological damage |
|
Mr Rothwell developed irritable bowel syndrome as a result of a recognised psychiatric
illness from which he suffered. Once more, the Court stated that the defendants were not liable
because it was not foreseeable that this type of psychiatric damage could occur in someone of
normal fortitude. |
|
| Reasons for the decision |
|
If the judgment is upheld in the House of Lords, the insurance industry estimated it would
save the insurance industry around £1.4 billion in pleural plaque claims.
|
|
| What happens next |
Please contact us if you have any questions. We will still assess your claim and contact you if it is possible to
claim for Pleural Plaques after the court of appeal.
Call us on Free Phone: 0800 783 9535 and ask for Lynne Manners or Warren Miller. |
|
|
|
|
|
